



This is FiltersetP without the need for the AdBlock extension.
NO, an "update" is NOT NEEDED. You can update your own; as I find and properly check new elements/source/href blocks, I will incorporate them after sufficient testing. If you try to eliminate every single ad, FiltersetP will be 3 miles long and/or you'll have false positives, folks. If you see an ad popping up, right click it and get its properties, or inspect the element in DOM Inspector and add it to your personal list. I have a self-imposed, non-paid responsibility to make sure people don't have false positives. I don't even a "donate" button on here.
It goes without saying, don't use it if you actually want to see ads. These blockers ALL apply to several, up to hundreds, of sites. This is the result of 42 months of optimizing filters first for AdBlock, and now for a standalone script. You will find this as quick & efficient as the original FiltersetP for AdBlock - except at ~16k, this style is 3 - 7% the size of the installed AB extension folder alone! Avatar/emoticon blocking is now a separate script (also updated/compliled/optimized), along with other site-specific scripts I've developed here. Although this script does not "block" ads but rather "blocks them view," it alleviates the overhead of the extension altogether - so page loading is, IMO, faster. No it won't block cookies - there are other programs for that so I'd appreciate them not being compared.
If you're a fan of "whitelisting," which has always seemed a bad policy to me, then you should use the AdBlock extension and whitelisting. That is not generally available in css although some have managed to do it. I believe a filter is either good or it isn't; whitelisting just attempt to make up for a bad filter.
Please DO NOT incorporate ANY of this FiltersetP Style when forming other "adblocking compilation" styles. False positives are nasty, and if there's "versions of versions of copied subversions" all over the planet, people will complain with no recourse since they're not using THIS one, the PROPER one. That's why I like contact with folks who do see a problem, so it can be quickly resolved. I'd rather DROP a "filter" altogether than either whitelist for a certain site or have people endure lack of functionality on site(s) they visit. It's just not worth having if it's "risky."
*****Many thanks to those of you who spotted and helped me correct a false positive.*****
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CURRENT NEWS and COMMENTS:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
smsmith had a suggestion about richmediayahoo - I tried adding that, and incorporating in my Hosts file - and with sketchy results in terms of contacting f370/yahoo - so leaning toward "safety against falsies," I'm not adding it but thank you for the kind suggestion. However, I have added to the elements portion, which might help. If you search my styles you'll find a "Yahoo graveyard" of additional terms you might all try - I gave up on a definitive YH filterset because they change often and are perhaps the most "tricky," especially for Yahoo users who get into very fine detailed levels of email. I'd rather you see an ad than lose something important.
The inclusion of blocking links with "javax" in their href makes browsing through the Java API documentation difficult. Otherwise, absolutely amazing replacement for a previously needed extension.
When I click on a thumbnail at one of joggs.com pornstar galleries, FiltersetP blocks everything (including the enlarged picture). Fix please.
I agree with User Styles. More and more ads are getting through, and an update is needed.
I have adblocking filtersetp installed and it has always worked like a charm, but lately
its been not blocking a lot of ads. Is there any new enhancements out there?
This is absolutely amazing. We all appreciate the work that has been put into this. :)
You may wish to consider adding:
richmedia.yimg.comIt blocks some of the ads that seem to persist on Yahoo! with this style. I haven't found anything broken yet because of this addition. If I find something is broken, I'll post back here.
Keep up the great work!
awesome!!
You're definitely my ad filter of choice !
One thing I noticed is it blocks links on craigslist for example: http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sfc/etc/479801040.html should have a link to a survey in it.
Anyway, thanks for your great work! I like it.
Kudos for a wonderful style; however, I noticed that with the primary reason I downloaded 'Ad Blocking FiltersetP' (MIVA_AdLink), it not only removes the green underline and the Floating Ad on hover but it also completely removes the offending word making documents difficult to comprehend)
e.g. http://www.fitnessattitudes.com/pilates.htmlIs this by design? fixable? known bug?
Aside from this, "good effort" for your "Great work" on this "quintessential ad blocking style". I look forward to a response/update/solution.
Noticed that there was a new version (3.40) but found that it somehow underlines certain paragraphs on Betanews. Like this:
http://www.betanews.com/article/The_YouTube_Debates_Whose_Platform_Is_It_Anyway/1185306390
Great work... thanks
there is a memory leak, till another update, stick with ABP. other than that, not bad
This is a good effort. However, Privoxy (along with the FoxyProxy extension) is far more effective at blocking ads *and* cookies. This stylesheet will hide ads but they will still be downloaded, along with cookies from those domains.
The quintessential ad blocking style.
It blocks most from www.clickthecity.com as well
great thanks i give!!! :p
no more Filterset.G Updater I hate that add-on and now I got this magnificent filter
#1) FiltersetP
Its been pretty good so far but it blocks most of the links on http://inextremo.puck-records.de/
Removing [href*="shop/index.php"] fixed it.
cool !!! clean version, good for eyes! :D
Fantastic! Thanks for being so responsive regarding my false positive. Why use an extension for adblocking when a lean, mean tool like this is available? Kudos!!
I think your last selector [class="iAs"] should be using color:inherit, instead of color:black. That way it uses the text color of its parent element, instead of assuming all web sites use black text ;p
This may be more conventional than Adblock Plus but it is less useful. There is no ability to whitelist sites and/or ads and it has more false positives than Adblock. One major false positive render the download page of http://www.adultswim.com useless. There are false positives in email ads that I subscribe to from multiple vendors completely rendering the email useless. One such vendor is Gap Inc. (Old Navy, Gap, Banana Republic). Links that contain the word ads (though they are not ads) are completely removed and renders content inaccessible. One example would be to go to http://www.consumerist.com and do a search for "black friday". You will notice that on the second page of results certain posts links are missing because they contain the word ad or ads. Your style could also use more documentation and comments so that we would know how each section works and not have to go through the time consuming task of picking stuff out one by one.
*UPDATE*
Paulfox has contacted me personally to work out my issues. My original rating has been removed pending the outcome and was solely based on a comparison with Adblock Plus on its efficiency and ease of use and customization.
I`m Having a problem with when trying to install it with Greasemonkey this Msg appears to me http://img147.imageshack.us/img147/7152/greasesq1.jpg
and when i click on Greasemonkey it shows that no scripts installed so how can i fix this ?
Great work!
A magic wand for getting rid of ads that I've used it for weeks now with no problems. Excellent work!
For Yahoo problems, you can replace [id^="advert"] with [id^="advert"]:not([class="md-sub"])
and replace [href*="qks"] with [href*="qks"]:not([href*="qkssh"])See http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=2573435#2573435
This causes problems with the finance.yahoo.com dropdown menus for some reason. The CSS menus do not move to the appropriate part of the page and remain just off to the right of the window where they cannot be accessed... When I disable it, everything works fine.
This blocks the images at http://www.google.com/ig/directory
Paulfox, this is a very nice add-on style.
Easy, Awesome & effective!
Awesome work.
I have disabled Adblock plus w FiltersetG to give this a try & so far this is working great. I also use the extension 'Remove It Permanently' which enables a final cleaning of the page - often what remains is the word 'Advertisement' which RIP can eliminate. If this uses fewer resources, does its job faster and continues to give these good results, no doubt this nets out as a plus. Thank you for doing the work.
Top work Sir, this and the NoScript plugin are Firefox essentials. You have done a great service to web-surfers all over the world,
You need to change your name to David Blaine(magician)! Nice job Paul
Works as good as my Filter for AdBlock :)
terrific - makes Tb usable for RSS reading in the absence of ABP currently..
Great, Paul, thanks! I uninstalled ADP now thanks to you and np. Keep it up!
Great work!! Most people could use this and not need another extension at all, for ad blocking. Keep up the good work.
Superb list. Cleans the pages nicely.
I've used various versions of AdBlock - no more. This does the job efficiently and without the extension at all! Not seeing ads! 5 stars!/ TxEd
This definitely is pushing the power of stylesheets to the max. Excellent work, Paul! Now if only you could make styles detect innerHTML...
Wow, great work Paul!!! Thanks for your efforts.